Poverty threatens wildlife conservation despite widespread efforts to integrate conservation and development so that local communities benefit. So what’s going wrong? A research project suggests it’s social justice that’s missing.
Aug 24, 2014 – . All too often, Integrated Conservation and Development (ICD) projects fail to stop poaching, encroachment and other activities that threaten the world’s most endangered animals. One example is Uganda’s mountain gorillas, living in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park.
Bwindi is home to around half of the world’s population of this critically endangered species. And it lies in one of the poorest and most densely populated regions of Africa. Bwindi adopted an ICD approach shortly after it became a national park in 1991 and ICD has been a key way for park authorities to improve relations with local communities.
But now, more than 20 years later, with illegal bushmeat hunting and timber collection continuing, IIED and partners are researching how ICD can do more for both protected area conservation and local livelihoods.
Who are the poorest of the poor?
The poorest people live in the ‘frontline zone’, extending about 0.5km from Bwindi’s boundary where crops and livestock are frequently raided by wild animals. They are at greater risk of disease because they have fewer sanitation facilities. They have less education, making it harder to find work, and they live far from trading centres and transport that others within their community benefit from. All of that creates a perpetuating trap of poverty.
Do they benefit from ICD projects?
Some ICD benefits are reaching people in the frontline zone. But few or no ICD benefits are reaching the poorest people living there.
The poorest people also feel less involved with decision-making and less ownership of ICD projects. From investigating why this was so, it appeared that most ICD projects occur near trading centres and roads, but not in remote areas where the poorest live.
Who and why?
We wanted to understand who uses Bwindi’s resources illegally, and why, despite ICD. People who have been arrested for illegal resource use were generally poorer than other local residents and lived close to the national park and far from trading centres – suggesting poverty is the major issue.
Please continue to read this very interesting article by Julia Baker, a biodiversity specialist, on the IIED Blog.
For this project, IIED partnered with the Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation (ITFC), the Jane Goodall Institute-Uganda, Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (ACODE), Imperial College Conservation Science and Parsons Brinckerhoff.
bw
Read more about reducing local poverty in Bwindi here .
Please follow IIED – International Institute for Environment and Development on Facebook and @iied on Twitter
Please read the original story at: IIED